Cannibalism, sacrifice, and hunting in National Parks

From ANIMAL PEOPLE,  April 2001:

 

FLAGSTAFF,  Arizona–As many as 40 newly hatched golden eagles and redtailed hawks may be stolen fron nests within the Wupatki National Monument north of Flagstaff this spring for sacrifices originating out of some of the nastiest known history in North America.

The eagles are the sacred totems of the Navajo;  redtails are the totems of their traditional allies,  the Apache.

For approximately 1,000 years the ancestors of the modern-day Navajo and Apache treated the Pueblo civilization built by the Hopi and related tribes like a larder.

During droughts betwen roughly 1080 and 1580,  Navajo and Apache raiders often stole Pueblo corn,  massacred Pueblo adults, and cannibalized the children.

In between,  the Navajo and Apache terrorized the Pueblo tribes for amusement.

Cannibalism faded out but frequent raids continued long after the Spanish conquered what remained of the Pueblo civilization and converted the survivors–nominally–to Catholicism.

Unable to distinguish one tribe from another,  Spanish garrisons at times retaliated for Navajo and Apache mayhem inflicted on remote missions by killing any Pueblo people who remained nearby.

Kit Carson and the U.S. Cavalry finally stopped the murderous cycle in 1863-1864 by poisoning and shooting all the Navajo sheep. Starved into submission, the former Navajo raiders waited out the U.S. Civil War in concentration camps.  They were then given new sheep,  of Old World breeds,  and moved to the fringes of Hopi land in the Four Corners area,  where Arizona,  Colorado,  New Mexi-co, and Utah meet.  There–with Navajos surrounding the less numerous Hopi–the tribes have uneasily coexisted ever since.

Historically the Pueblo tribes were far more numerous,  more affluent,  and much more technologically advanced than the Navajo and Apache, yet seemed perennially unable to mount effective self-defense.  The Hopi,  however,  evolved a religious ritual which mocked the Navajo and Apache by attacking their totems.

Each spring,  Hopi men would raid the nests of cliff-dwelling golden eagles and redtails,  steal the hatchlings,  leave gifts in their places,  and bring the hatchlings home to raise as tethered captives.  In midsummer,  just before the young birds became capable of flight,  they were ceremonially smothered to death in corn meal, plucked,  and buried.  The feathers were used in connection with special prayers and to costume kachina dolls.  Eagles and eagle feathers were most highly prized.

The Hopi have continued the ritual despite sporadic efforts of missionaries and U.S. government agencies to repress it.

The sacrifices seemed to be history from the 1962 passage of the Bald Eagle Protection Act,  which also protected golden eagles and was superseded by the Endangered Species Act,  until 1994,  after both bald eagles and golden eagles were downlisted from “endangered” to “threatened” status.

But few eagles’ nests were left on Hopi territory.  When Hopi attacked eagles’ nests on Navajo land near Indian Wells,  Arizona, in 1995,  1996,  and 1999,  Navajo police tried to protect the eaglets.  Intertribal friction flared.

Then-Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt bought time by allowing the Hopi to capture eaglets on National Forest land–but the largest concentrations of eagles’ nests in the Four Corners area were within the Wupatki National Monument, near Flagstaff.

Removing eagles from “threatened” status coincidental with the sacrificial ceremonies in July 1999,  Babbitt in November 1999 proposed allowing the Hopi to capture eaglets from the National Monument.  The Wupatki National Monument had been officially off limits since 1924.  The Babbitt proposal accordingly required a regulatory breach in the Organic Act of 1916,  which created the National Park Service and has protected wildlife within National Parks and National Monuments ever since.

On January 22,  2001,  days before leaving office,  Babbitt published the proposed regulatory amendment,  to take effect in late March,  after a 60-day public comment period.  The amendment is vigorously opposed by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility,  humane organizations,  and many Navajo leaders,  and could be cancelled by Interior Secretary Gail Norton or President George W. Bush.

The amendment  is reportedly favored,  however,  by religious freedom advocates including Christian fundamentalist Bush supporters; 22 Indian tribes which also claim hunting,  fishing,  and trapping rights within National Parks;  and sport hunters and trappers who see the amendment as an opening to gaining access to National Park land.

 

Feather merchants

 

Eagle feathers are ceremonially important to many tribes, including the Navajo.  Most tribes obtain feathers from the National Eagle Repository near Denver,  which collects and parcels out feathers from dead eagles found by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.  Applicants wait up to three years for coveted back and tail feathers.

The delay,  combined with growing interest in traditional Native American religion,  has created a substantial market for poached feathers.  At least 31 illegal feather merchants have been prosecuted since 1994,  including Antonio Alvarez,  25,  of Lac du Flambeau,  Wisconsin,  who drew five months in prison and five months in a halfway house on January 11 for hiding an eagle carcass at his girlfriend’s home on the Lac du Flambeau reservation,  and Gilbert George Walks,  38,  of Crow Agency,  Montana,  who on March 8 pleaded guilty to selling 17 feet,  a wing,  and a tail from bald eagles.

Former President Bill Clinton on his last day in office reversed one of the best-known convictions,  however,  pardoning Peggy A. Bargon of Monticello,  Illinois,  who was charged in 1995 after presenting a “dream-catcher” made from eagle,  owl,  and wild turkey feathers to former First Lady Hilary Clinton,  who is now a U.S. Senator from New York.

Founding the Navajo Zoo at Window Rock,  New Mexico,  in 1963 to house a bear who could not be returned to the wild,  the Navajo Museum subsequently accepted eagles and other birds donated by wildlife agencies,  and enabled Navajo shamen to bypass the National Eagle Repository by giving them fallen feathers.

The future of the seven-acre zoo was jeopardized in January 1999 when former Navajo tribal president Milton Bluehouse ordered–on his last day in office–that it be closed and the animals be released.  Bluehouse said that two Navajo women had seen deities in a vision,  who told them that keeping the animals prisoner was blasphemy,  even though most arrived at the zoo after suffering injuries that would inhibit their survival in the wild.  Others have never lived in the wild.

Bluehouse’s successor,  Kelsey Begaye,  allowed the zoo to remain open for the remainder of the lives of the animals,  but declared that it should not be expanded.

As the controversy subsided,  the Zuni tribe opened a similar facility for non-releasable eagles and other birds at Zuni Pueblo, New Mexico.

The Zuni are the largest of the surviving Pueblo tribes.  The Zuni of Jemez,  and Acoma Pueblos sparked global protest led by United Poultry Concerns and Animal Protection of New Mexico in 1995, after the All Indian Pueblo Council and New Mexico Department of Tourism promoted their spring “rooster pulls” as a visitor attraction.  Introduced by the Spanish in the late 16th century, “rooster pulls” are a contest in which a rooster is buried to his neck,  after which riders try to pluck him from the earth by the head.

The pulls occur on the feast days of St. John and St. James. Formerly practiced in other pueblos too,  they are believed to continue in Jemez and Acoma as private events.

 

 

Legislative updates

From ANIMAL PEOPLE,  April 2001:

 

WASHINGTON D.C.;  State Capitols–U.S. Senator Wayne Allard,  DVM (R-Colorado) and Representative Collin Peterson (D-Minnesota),  chair of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus,  on March 15 reintroduced a bill they pursued in 2000 to ban interstate transport of gamecocks.

The bill, which has 36 Senate  co-sponsors,  would allow the 47 states which have outlawed cockfighting to crack down on suspected cockfighters who claim to raise roosters strictly for sale to the three states–Louisiana,  New Mexico,  and Oklahoma–where cockfighting is still legal.

The 2000 edition of the bill eventually had 60 Senate cosponsors and more than 200 cosponsors in the House, and easily cleared the Senate Agriculture Committee,  but Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Mississippi) never brought it to the full Senate floor.

Allard said the reintroduced bill is endorsed by both Lott and House Majority Whip Don Nickles (R-Okla.)

In Oklahoma,  where the state supreme court is to rule on the validity of a petition to place a proposed cockfighting ban on the 2002 ballot,  the state senate on March 2002 passed a bill by Frank Shurden (D-Henryetta) to protect cockfighting,  hunting,  fishing, and rodeo with a state constitutional amendment.  If the bill also clears the state house,  and if the petition for the cockfighting ban

wins state supreme court approval,  both propositions would be on the 2002 ballot.  The anti-cockfighting measure was to be on the 2000 ballot,  but was delayed after the Oklahoma Gamefowl Breeders Association charged that 43,305 signatures were improperly gathered.

Kansas cockfighters on March 20 killed a bill by state senator David Haley (D-Kansas City) to create a felony cruelty penalty.  A companion bill had cleared the Kansas house one day earlier.  Also on March 20,  the Arkansas house judiciary committee killed a felony cruelty penalty bill by Jim Wood (D-Tupelo),  which was vehemently opposed by the Farm Bureau Federation.

A proposed Minnesota felony cruelty bill introduced by Don Betzold (DFL-Fridley) on February 22 cleared the state senate crime prevention committee,  and state representative James Clark (R-New Ulm) introduce a state house companion bill on February 23,  but a scheduled senate floor vote was indefinitely postponed on February 26 after senators Bob Lessard (IP-Intl. Falls) and Charlie Berg (R-Chokio) objected that it could apply to killing cats.  Berg,  a

trapper,  told fellow senate members that when he catches a cat,  “I practice my marksmanship.”

Bills to create felony cruelty penalties were also introduced in Nevada and Maine.  The Nevada bill was upstaged,  however,  when assembly member Tom Collins (D-North Las Vegas) introduced a bill which would prevent any local government from adopting animal-related legislation more stringent than the state laws.   Collins claimed the bill was meant to prevent animal activists from banning rodeos and cricuses,  but critics including Doug Trenner of the Las Vegas Valley Humane Society say it could undo locally appropriate animal control legislation.

The Maine felony cruelty bill was among a flurry of animal-related proposed legislation,  also including an attempt by representative Christopher Muse (D-Portland) to ban elephants from traveling circuses,  killed in committee on March 22;  a still pending bill to increase dog owners’ economic responsibility for injuries their dogs do to other people,  to enable victims to recover treatment costs without having to resort to lawsuit;  an anti-bestiality bill;  and a pair of bills to criminalize the use of threats against animals to terrorize people.  Animal abuse and threats against animals made to intimidate people are already criminalized under the anti-stalking laws of at least 40 states.

The biggest state legislative victory for animal protection of the early spring came in Mississippi,  where newly elected governor Ronnie Musgrove promptly signed into law a bill by senator Ron Farris to enable law enforcement agencies to seize animals in cases of suspected cruelty or neglect.  In Defense of Animals’

Mississippi project coordinator Doll Stanley credited passage of the bill to the work of Mississippi Animal Wel-fare Alliance secretary Marie Taylor.

Legislative brawls are brewing in California over AB 161,  SB 236,  and AB 1336,  which would bring breeders of two or more litters per year under state laws pertaining to pet dealers;  establish statewide pet licensing and microchipping,  and require that all dogs and cats be microchipped and licensed before any transfer;  and prohibit dealers and stores from selling unsterilized dogs and cats.

Introduced by assembly member Jack O’Connell (D-Santa Barbara),  for

Animal Legis-lative Activist Network founder Richard G. McLellan, M.D.,   SB 236  exempts feral cats who are under care of “registered” rescue groups.

 

United Kingdom

 

The British House of Lords –as expected–on March 26 overturned the ban on foxhunting which was passed by the House of Commons in January,  and also rejected a compromise bill which would have left the matter up to local councils.

Norman Baker,  spokesperson for the British Liberal Democrat party,  on March 12 announced that the party platform for an election campaign expected in late summer or early fall,  will “include the creation of an Animal Protection Commission,  headed by a Department of the Environment,  Transport,  and the Regions minister,  to enforce standards in the treatment of animals. We will extend the size and powers of the Home Office Inspector-ate and encourage more, and more unannounced,  inspections of establishments that engage in animal experimentation,”  Baker pledged.  The Liberal Democrats are the third largest British political party,  holding 3% of the seats in the House of Commons.

 

Wolves, seals, whales, and when will the winter end?

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 2001:

OSTERDALEN, Norway–Twenty-three hunters sent by the Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management to kill nearly half the wolves in Norway were expected to seek a court order, as ANIMAL PEOPLE went to press on February 21, 2001, to close the Osterdalen Valley to all people not associated with the killing.

Read more

B.C. halts grizzly hunts

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 2001:

VICTORIA, B.C.–British Columbia premier Ujjal Dosanjh on February 8 announced a three-year moratorium on hunting grizzly bears within the province, as sought by Environmental Investigation Agency campaigner Martin Powell in an open letter published in the January/February 2001 edition of ANIMAL PEOPLE. In the interim, Dosanjh asked scientists to resolve conflicting estimates which put the B.C. grizzly population at anywhere from 4,000 to 13,000.

Read more

Rare Presa Canario dogs kill twice in just 10 days

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 2001:

SAGINAW, Michigan; SAN FRANCISCO–Parallel fatal attacks in late January moved the Presa Canario, or bull mastiff, to the top of the list of suspected inherently dangerous dog breeds.

Kelly S. Jaime on January 16, 2001 died just inside the door of her apartment in Saginaw, Mich-igan, after an attack by two Presa Canarios allegedly owned by relatives who lived downstairs. Jaime, 22, had married a soldier stationed in Texas three weeks earlier.

Read more

Direct actions and agents provocateur

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 2001:

HUNTINGDON, U.K.–Admitting concern that bombings and arsons put assets at risk, the Royal Bank of Scotland on January 19, 2001 recalled $33 million in loans to Huntingdon Life Sciences–one of the world’s largest contract testing labs. The vehicles of 10 Huntingdon employees had been bombed since May 2000. Five bombs exploded; flames from two bombings also damaged employees’ houses.

Five other banks and investment firms earlier cancelled investments in Hunting-don. On January 21, however, the Arkansas-based Stephens Group kept Huntingdon solvent with a five-year loan. The group holds 15.7% of the Huntingdon shares. Worth a reported $540 million in 1990, with about 850 staff, Huntingdon fell in estimated market value to just $8 million after BBC-4 reporter Zoe Broughton caught workers abusing animals on video in 1997. Then-PETA investigator Michelle Rokke at almost the same time obtained similar video from inside a New Jersey subsidiary.

Read more

What will Bush do about ferals?

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 2001:

WASHINGTON D.C.–Meeting the Invasive Species Challenge, the National Invasive Species Council management plan, was sent to the White House on January 18, 2001. Two years in development, the plan offers strategy through 2003 for a Cabinet-led crusade against
non-native wildlife. But the eight Cabinet members who signed it were already on
their way out of Washington D.C. Just two days from leaving office, former U.S. President
Bill Clinton probably never saw the plan. Whether anyone of rank in the George W. Bush administration will ever pay much attention to it remains unclear.

Read more

State Legislation

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 2001:
State legislation

Pending in the Oregon legislature is a bill by state senator Ryan Deckert (D-Beaverton) to amend the state anti-cruelty law to give more evidentiary weight to testimony about the behavior of animal victims. The amendment would help in prosecuting cases involving electroshock, improper confinement, and harassment, which may drive an animal insane without leaving physical evidence. Also pending in Oregon is an anti-bestiality bill by state senators Peter Courtney (D-Salem) and John Minnis (R-Wood Village). Minnis unsuccessfully introduced a similar bill in 1995.

Illinois state representative Tom Dart (D-Chicago) on February 5 introduced a bill to allow judges in animal hoarding cases to order psychiatric evaluation of the defendants, and oblige defendants to share the cost of caring for their impounded animals.

Read more

1 138 139 140 141 142 321