Wolves

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 1995:

The Denver-based Mountain States Legal
Foundation, a leading wise-use group, on September 7
sued the U.S. government for $500 on behalf of rancher
Eugene Hassey, 74, of Lemhi County, Idaho, who claims
the sum in compensation for a calf he says was killed in
January by a wolf released as part of the Yellowstone/central
Idaho wolf restoration project. An unknown party shot the
wolf as she ate the carcass. Defenders of Wildlife was initially
prepared to pay Hussey out of a fund that since 1987
has paid about 20 Michigan, Montana, and Minnesota
ranchers a total of circa $17,000 for alleged wolf predation
losses––but a federal autopsy found the calf died during
birth, and the wolf only scavenged her remains. Hassey
claimed at a March 29 Congressional hearing that he was
abused by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service agents Tom Riley,
Steve Magone, and Paul Weyland when they tried to execute
a warrant to search his property for evidence in the wolf
shooting. Idaho attorney general Alan Lance compared
them to “the secret police or the Keystone Kops.” But a transcript
of a tape recording the agents made during the incident,
released September 13, revealed that they remained
calm and professional while Hassey cursed them and threw
rocks at them until sheriff Brett Barsalou arrived and ordered
them to leave.

Read more

Book Reviews

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

CANINE CLASSICS
War Against The Wolf America’s
Campaign to Exterminate the Wolf, edited by
Rick McIntyre. Voyageur Press
(POB 338, 123 N. 2nd St., Stillwater,
MN 55082), 1995. 495 pages; $24.95
cloth.
Between the grim subject and the
brick-like heft of War Against The Wolf,
we weren’t looking forward to the
read––but it was in the office less than an
hour when we first used it as a reference.
A compendium of news coverage and relat-
ed historical documents, it doesn’t exactly
include all the best writing about wolves or
all the most important details of recent pro-
wolf campaigns. Omitted, for instance,
are any mention of either Jack London,
Farley Mowat, or Friends of Animals,
respectively wolves’ leading image-makers
past and present and the leading organiza-
tion in the defense of Alaskan wolves.
Enough important stuff is included, how-
ever, to make War Against The Wolf a
worthy addition to wildlifelibraries.

Read more

Tales from the Cryptozoologists

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

A fanged skull two boys found along a river-
bank on the edge of Bodmin Moor, England,
belonged to a leopard, but the leopard was apparently
killed and skinned years ago in India, the London Zoo
reported on August 7. The find came just a month after
an eight-month study by the Ministry of Agriculture con-
cluded that the only wild felines on the moor, contrary
to longtime rumors of black leopards on the loose, were
feral domestic cats.
Wang Fangchen, leader of a 30-member
team who spent June and July seeking a mysterious
apeman in heavily wooded Shennongjia National
Park, of central Hubei province, China, says he’ll lead a
second search perhaps as early as September, “as soon
as the rainy season is over.” All he found this time was
some unidentified hair, but a 1993 video convinced
Wang that the creature exists. “It is possible that their
numbers dwindled as the environment changed in recent
years,” he said.

Tapirs in trouble

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

“The insatiable human appetite for meat and
animal products is devouring the mountain tapir’s pre-
cious Andean home,” writes wildlife ecologist Craig
Downer, “even within Sangay National Park,
Ecuador, a UNESCO World Heritage area. In my six
years there, my study area has gone from lightly to
grievously invaded by cattle. Fires set by vaqueros
have substantially reduced the cloud forests, the
tapirs’ most essential habitat. Hunters have killed at
least 50 tapirs within the park, including four of the
seven I have radio-collared. As a member of the
International Union for the Conservation of Nature

Species survival commission, I am presently prepar-
ing an action plan for the rescue of this species.”

Why call it science? by Ric O’Barry

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

A lot of people have a misconception about how
we prepare captive dolphins to return to the wild. They
think we t r a i n them for that. We taught them to jump
through hoops; now we teach them to survive in the wild.
And how do we teach them? Scientifically.
Even many of the people working to readapt and
release captive dolphins think this is what we’re doing. But
how could dolphins be taught what they ought to know when
what they need to know is not to listen to me or anyone else?
What I actually do is so simple that most people
don’t get it. There is no mystery to it. In my protocol for the
readaption and release of captive dolphins, I have three
basic rules: 1) Assume you know nothing. 2) Maintain
sustained observation. 3) Consider the obvious.

Read more

Wildlife & people

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

A day camp worker and a park
ranger on July 28 captured a three-foot
alligator in Kissena Park Lake, Queens,
New York. Days later, two young alligators
were found roaming Central Islip––and then
two pet rhesus monkeys escaped from their
owner’s home in Hauppauge, one of whom
bit an animal control officer. When an 11-
year-old hooked a piranha in Lake
Ronkonkoma, Long Island Newsday probed
the local exotic pet trade and found an Oyster
Bay store displaying alligators, monkeys,
ferrets, pythons, bobcat cubs and a wallaby,
all in violation of both state and town law.

Read more

Animal control & rescue

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

New legislation
An update of Louisiana animal
protection laws long sought by
Legislation In Support of Animals, the
Coalition of Louisiana Animal Advocates,
and other state groups includes the stiffest
felony cruelty statute in the U.S., mandat-
ing a fine of not less than $1,000, up to
$25,000, plus from one year in prison up
to 10 years at hard labor; fines for misde-
meanor cruelty of up to $1,000 and 48
hours of community service plus jail time;
the extension of the cruelty law to cover
parrots, parakeets, and lovebirds (but not
fighting cocks); the extension of the state’s
anti-dog theft law to cover other pets, with
stiffer penalties; and the creation of a fund
to help save the scarce Louisiana specta-
cled bear, funded by sales of a special
license plate. Known for gung-ho effica-
cy––on a budget of just $50,000/year––
LISA celebrated by bringing the
Spay/Neuter Assistance Program mobile
clinic from Houston to New Orleans for a
weekend of providing free neutering to
low-income families.

Read more

ANIMAL HEALTH

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

RABIES NOTES
Post-exposure shots for 665 people
who came into contact with a rabid kitten in a pet
store in Concord, New Hampshire, last October,
together with other essential follow-up, cost $1.5
million, says the CDCP.
The Pet Savers Foundation has pro-
posed establishing a National Rabies Awareness
D a y. “Letters to Congress supporting Rabies
Awareness Day would be very helpful,” Charlie
McGinley of Pet Savers told ANIMAL PEOPLE.
Get details c/o 14 Vanderventer Ave., Port
Washington, NY 11050; 516-944-5025.
Two residents of San Rafael,
California, were bitten by rabid bats in June,
including a 5-year-old boy playing near a backyard
pool and a woman who was swimming. The bats
in each case were apparently attracted by insects
hovering over the water.
A laborer from Anhui province,
China, bit four people including a pregnant
woman on July 19 in the city of Suzhou, a month
after he was bitten by two rabid dogs.

Read more

Hunting & trapping

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1995:

Results of a major public
opinion survey commissioned by
the Colorado Division of Wildlife
“indicate that a substantial major-
ity of Coloradans would vote to
ban wildlife trapping,” human
dimensions coordinator Linda
Sikorowski advised the brass on
July 13. “A substantial proportion
of Colorado residents are positively
oriented toward wildlife rights and
wildlife welfare values,” she contin-
ued. “Trapping solely for the pur-
pose of recreation or for economic
gain is not adequate justification for
trapping to the Colorado public.”
The survey found that trapping
could best be sold as a means of
rabies prevention and wildlife popu-
lation control––but this might not be
for long, as the advent of oral rabies
vaccination of wildlife reinforces the
22-year-old position of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention
that trapping is neither effective
against rabies nor in lastingly
depressing wildlife populations.

Read more

1 131 132 133 134 135 173