Can San Francisco quit killing pet surplus? SPCA moves toward national precedent; ANIMAL CONTROL COMMUNITY ANXIOUS, SKEPTICAL

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, November 1993:

SAN FRANCISCO, California––Known for controversial innovation, San
Francisco SPCA president Richard Avanzino touched off perhaps the biggest furor of his
career in September by proposing that the city pound should stop euthanizing animals purely
for the purpose of population control––and offering to take care of adopting out the animals.
Not just an idealistic gesture but a detailed plan, Avanzino’s strategy for increasing
placement of adoptable animals is backed by a million-dollar special budget and an SFSPCA
shelter expansion already underway. If Avanzino achieves the goal, San Francisco will
become the first major city ever to achieve victory over pet overpopulation.
And the goal is within sight. Since Avanzino returned the municipal animal control
contract to the city in 1989, the SFSPCA has concentrated upon promoting adoptions, discount
neutering, humane education, and improving relations between landlords and tenants with
pets. The payoff has become evident in plummeting euthanasia rates not only at the SFSPCA
itself, which has virtually become a no-kill shelter, but also at the city Animal Care and
Control Department shelter.

Read more

Report to Congress on Animal Enterprise Terrorism

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, November 1993:

WASHINGTON D.C. The newly released Department of
Justice/USDA Report to Congress on Animal Enterprise Terrorism man-
dated by the Animal Enterprise Protection Act of 1992 found that “The
FBI has categorized only a few animal rights-related incidents as acts of
domestic terrorism,” Assistant U.S. Attorney General Sheila Anthony and
Assistant Secretary of Agriculture Eugene Branstool stated in presenting it.
Therefore, they explained, “for purposes of this report, the term
‘animal rights extremism’ includes all acts of destruction or disruption per-
petrated against animal enterprises or their employees.”
Thus widening the topic to include petty vandalism, the report
recorded 313 “animal rights-related incidents” from 1977 through June 30,
1993. None involved significant injury to either people or animals.
Among the incidents were 160 cases of petty vandalism, 77 thefts or
releases of animals, 29 personal threats, 26 cases of major vandalism, 21
arsons, 16 bomb threats, 14 fire bombs, nine bombing hoaxes, and three
actual bombing attempts. The report failed to note the role of security
agents hired by U.S. Surgical Corporation in encouraging, aiding, and
abetting Fran Trutt in the best known bombing case. Trutt, who had only
marginal involvement in animal rights, served a year in jail for placing a
pipe bomb in the U.S. Surgical parking lot in November 1988––paid for by
the operatives for U.S. Surgical, one of whom drove her to the site.

Read more

Watson trial Dec. 6 ––if Canada dares

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 1993:

ST. JOHN’S, NEWFOUND-
LAND––Enjoying his new reputation in
Canada as “Captain Cod Hugger” for his July
28 confrontation with foreign dragnetters in
the North Atlantic, Paul Watson of the Sea
Shepherd Conservation Society is to go to
trial December 6 before a St. John’s jury for
allegedly endangering the lives of his crew,
the crew of the Cuban dragger Rio Las Casas,
and the Rio Las Casas itself––if the
Canadian government actually has the nerve
to try Watson for an action applauded from
coast to coast, including by many of the
same people who have long reviled him for
his protests against seal hunting.

Read more

WOOFS AND GROWLS

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 1993:

THE WISE USE WISE GUYS ET AL
George Frampton’s last major task
before leaving the presidency of The Wilderness
Society to become Assistant Secretary for Fish,
Wildlife, and Parks in the Clinton administration
was to preside over the assembly of a 50-page
report called The Wise Use Movement: Strategic
Analysis and 50-State Review. It calls upon the
mainstream environmental movement to distance
itself from radical environmentalism, deep ecolo-
gy, and animal rights, while rebuilding alliances
with farmers and hunters.
The fall 1993 issue of Friends of
Animals’ ActionLine magazine features ANIMAL
PEOPLE editor Merritt Clifton’s “Attack of the
Wise Use Wise Guys,” an investigation of vio-
lence against animals and animal defenders by
members of the self-named “wise use movement.”
It’s $1.95, from POB 1244, Norwalk, CT 06856.
Having run low on friends in Washington D.C.,
Putting People First is relocating this month to
Helena, Montana––PPF president Kathleen
Marquardt’s birth state.

Read more

MEMO FROM ANDREW ROWAN

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 1993:

I have questioned the validity of
the national shelter statistics for more than
10 years. After discussing the issue with
the late Phyllis Wright in the early 1980s,
and with her support, we organized a work-
shop on the question at the Tufts Center for
Animals and Public Policy in 1984. The
workshop included the AHA, MSPCA,
HSUS, and ASPCA, plus a number of
local shelters known to have good statistics
and quality programs. As a result of the
workshop, I concluded that the animal
overpopulation problem had been dramati-
cally reduced, from shelters killing 20% of
the national owned dog and cat population
in 1973 to only 10% in 1982. As far as I
can tell, my claim for this progress has
been virtually ignored by nearly everyone
in the business, Phil Arkow being a notable
exception. Certainly no one has ever tried
to challenge it.

Read more

Editorial: Fighting the good fight

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 1993:

Those of us who have worked with cattle know that there are two ways to get a
balky cow to move. Cowpunchers yell, push, and beat the animal, who often becomes
even more obstinate. Milkmaids by contrast just walk in front of the cow, hands in pock-
ets, and she follows from curiosity. One experienced milkmaid with a pocket full of apples
could probably move more cattle farther, faster, than all the cowpunchers west of the
Mississippi, if she had a mind to, but no one has ever convinced the punchers, who con-
tinue to rave and kick and beat on almost every farm and feedlot.
Persuading the public to adopt humane attitudes and practices often seems similar-
ly frustrating. Problems and solutions evident to those of us in animal protection are
ignored and overlooked time and again by governmental authorities, whether we’re talking
about violence to animals as precursor of violence to humans, the folly of spending mil-
lions for animal control but next to nothing on animal population control, or the hidden
costs of the meat industry to human and environmental health. Undeniably, progress is
being made, and even in comparison with a few years ago, it is impressive in many areas:
the rapid drop in animal shelter euthanasia rates, the decline of sport hunting, the collapse
of the fur trade, and the exponential increase of interest in vegetarianism, to cite just a
handful. Still, the progress can seem as slow relative to the size of some of the issues as
the pace of Old Bossy may seem to a young cowhand who’d rather be traveling at the pace
of a souped-up pickup truck.

Read more

Count finds 5 million euthanasias a year–– AHA SAYS 12 MILLION; WANTED TO DISCREDIT PET BREEDERS

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 1993:

ENGLEWOOD, Colorado––
Knowing that an ongoing shelter-by-shel-
ter, state-by-state count has demonstrated
the annual U.S. euthanasia toll due to pet
overpopulation to be under six million
animals per year, the American Humane
Association on September 7 told mass
media that, “In 1992, a dog or cat was
euthanized every two seconds in this
country––12.1 million dogs and cats in
all.” The AHA release also maintained
that euthanasias are again increasing after
eight years of decline.

Read more

WOOFS AND GROWLS

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1993:

The Better Business Bureau has announced that the National
Anti-Vivisection Society fails to meet requirements that “an
organization provide on request an annual report containing
information on governance (such as a roster of the board of directors) and
financial activities (such as total income and a break-
down of expenses); that its financial statements present
adequate information to serve as a basis for informed
decisions; and that it substantiate on request its applica-
tion of funds, in accordance with donor expectations,
to the programs and activities described in solicita-
tions.” Exposes by ANIMAL PEOPLE editor Merritt
Clifton recently documented the generous compensation
NAVS provides to president Peggy Cunniff and other
members of her family, who dominate the NAVS board
and payroll. NAVS told BBB that it “has changed its
accounting and auditing methods to meet the standards
for fiscal year 1993,” but recent forced resignations,
dismissals, and staff transfers have left the Cunniffs
more firmly in control than ever.

Read more

Guest column: Don’t call me a pimp by Margaret Anne Cleek

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1993:

When I lived in Detroit, I had a close friend who
was a state welfare fraud investigator. To hear him tell it,
every welfare mom was living it up on the dole, thought
she had a right to have the government provide for every
child she had, and had a man stashed away who lived off
her check. His solution was to cut off the freeloading and
make these people work for a living. He dehumanized all
people on welfare, calling them the “scum de la scum,”
and always expected the worst of them.
Why did he think all welfare recipients were rip-
ping off the system? The system abusers were the only peo-
ple he ever saw. His perception of the situation was distort-
ed because his sample did not accurately reflect the popula-
tion of welfare recipients. His contempt for the people and
the system left him unable to understand the complexity of
the issues and solutions. But as he saw it, he was in the
front lines and therefore he knew what needed to be done.

Read more

1 41 42 43 44 45 48