Who Gets The Money? — 17th annual edition

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:
Starting on page 15 is our 17th annual report on the budgets,
assets, and salaries paid by the major U.S. animal-related
charities, plus miscellaneous local activist groups, humane
societies, and some prominent organizations abroad. We offer their
data for comparative purposes. Foreign data is stated in U.S.
dollars at representative exchange rates.
Most charities are identified in the second column by what
they do and stand for: A for advocacy, C for conservation of
habitat via acquisition, E for education, H for support of hunting,
I for supporting the eradication of “invasive” feral or non-native
species, L for litigation, P for publication, S for
shelter/sanctuary maintenance or sterilization project, U for
favoring either “sustainable” or aboriginal lethal use of wildlife,
and V for focus on vivisection.
As most listed charities do some advocacy and education, the
A and E designations are used with others only if advocacy and
education use more of the charities’ time and budget than other roles
for which they may be better known. Charities of obvious purpose may
not have a letter. While many charities pursue multiple activities,
space limits us to offering no more than three identifying letters.
Most of the financial data we cite for U.S. charities comes
from IRS Form 990 filings, usually covering fiscal year 2005. Form
990s from most U.S. charities are available– free–at
<www.guidestar.com>.

Read more

Press coverage, “animal rights,” and “terrorism”

 From ANIMAL PEOPLE,  December 2006:



	Among the 1,216 newspapers archived at News-Library.com, the 
word "terrorism" appeared in under 2% of all  coverage of "animal 
rights" until  after the 2001 Al Qaida attacks on New York City and 
Washington D.C.--but "terrorism" has been mentioned in more than 6% 
of "animal rights" coverage ever since.
	Total coverage of "animal rights"  topped 6,000 articles for 
the first time in 2000,  and has remained higher than in any year 
before 2000.


Year   AR in    AR linked
     articles  to "terror"

1980 -    10    0  0%
1981 -    18    0  0%
1982 -    39    1  2%
1983 -    84    2  2%
1984 -   212    5  2%
1985 -   454    4  1%
1986 -   594    7  1%
1987 - 1,058   12  1%
1988 - 1,604   27  2%
1989 - 2,881   31  1%
1990 - 4,979  102  2%
1991 - 4,691   52  1%
1992 - 4,530   41  1%
1993 - 4,639   46  1%
1994 - 4,133   23  0%
1995 - 3,808   73  2%
1996 - 5,081   46  1%
1997 - 5,385  124  2%
1998 - 5,587   73  1%
1999 - 5,871  145  3%
2000 - 6,450   74  1%
2001 - 5,664  263  5%
2002 - 5,900  342  6%
2003 - 6,691  423  6%
2004 - 6,262  358  6%
2005 - 6,618  483  7%
2006 - 6,629  392  6%

Canadian local & regional humane societies call “national” appeals misleading

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:
MONTREAL–An old grievance of U.S. local and regional humane
societies has erupted across Canada in response to appeals by the
shelterless Toronto-based Humane Society of Canada and the
Montreal-based Canadian SPCA, which operates a shelter and
sterilization clinic in Montreal.
Both organizations are widely seen as poaching on local turf,
but Canadian SPCA mailings have raised the most visible ire.
“Fundraising appeals sent by the Montreal SPCA list local
postal boxes on the donation pledge form, so that donors in Nova
Scotia would mail to a Halifax address and those in Saskatchewan to a
Moose Jaw address,” wrote Toronto Globe & Mail Montreal
correspondent Tu Thanh Ha.
“We find it quite annoying. We have a hard enough time
fundraising for ourselves,” Moose Jaw Humane Society director Ray
Whitney told Tu Thanh Ha.

Read more

Bush inks amended version of Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:

WASHINGTON D.C.–U.S. President George W.
Bush on November 27, 2006 signed into law the
Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. AETA extends to
animal industry workers the provisions of the
1982 Animal Enterprise Protection Act, which
covered only property.
Sent to Bush in final form on November
13, AETA is expected to be the last major piece
of animal-related legislation passed by the
Republican majority who had controlled both the
U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives
since the 1994 midterm Congressional election.
Control of both the House and the Senate
passed to the Democrats in the November 2006
midterm election. Opponents declared immediately
their intent to challenge AETA in court and seek
amendments in the next Congress, but support for
AETA was strong among both parties, and despite
allegations that AETA may infringe on civil
liberties, in final form it was not opposed by
the American Civil Liberties Union.

Read more

Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:
Oxford University theologian Andrew Linzey on November 28,
2006 announced the formation of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics,
home page <www.oxfordanimalethics.com>, which Linzey described as
“the world’s first academy dedicated to enhancing the ethical status
of animals through academic publication, teaching, and research.”
Nobel Literature Laureate J.M. Coetzee of South Africa was named
first Honorary Fellow of the institution. Author Jeffrey Masson was
named an Honorary Research Associate. Priscilla Cohn, author of
Contraception in Wildlife, Book I (1996), was named associate
director of the organization.

Petfinder.com sold

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:
Maureen Smith, chief executive of the Animal Planet cable
television channel, on November 2, 2006 announced that her company,
Discovery Communications Inc., is paying “about $35 million” to
purchase the adoption web site Petfinder.com and pet training video
firm PetsIncredible. Petfinder.com and PetsIncredible will become
part of the Animal Planet cable business unit.
The deal was disclosed just as Animal Planet caught flak from
Canned-Lion.com, founded by ANIMAL PEOPLE book and screen reviewers
Chris Mercer and Bev Pervan, of Cape Town, South Africa. Animal
Planet recently aired a documentary called White Lions: King of
Kings. The documentary, said Mercer, “presented Marius Prinsloo,
a notorious canned lion breeder in South Africa, as a paragon of
conservation working to preserve the white lion gene. The South
African canned lion industry is one of the cruelest industries in the
world,” Mercer alleged. “The South African environment minister,
himself a former hunter, has publicly described the canned hunting
fraternity as ‘environmental thugs.’ How could Animal Planet stoop
to whitewashing this industry, and present canned hunting as
conservation?”

Where IFAW $$ goes

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:
The International Fund for Animal Welfare on October 25,
2006 began building new offices in Yarmouth-port, Massachusetts. A
1.5-acre open space in the center of the complex will be named after
Juliana Kickert, of Sedona, Arizona, who died at age 64 in March
2006, leaving IFAW $10 million. IFAW raised $17.3 million in the
most recently reported fiscal year, but by its own reckoning spent
just $11.5 million on programs, and by ANIMAL PEOPLE reckoning spent
$6.8 million on programs, less than went into fundraising and
reserves.

Editorial: Strategies for changing the world

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:
In the 1940 Walt Disney animated cartoon feature Dumbo, The
Flying Elephant, the first and perhaps still most vivid screen
depiction of circus animal handling produced for a paying mass
audience, a troupe of drunken clowns speculate that if circus-goers
laugh at an elephant made to jump from a platform made to look like a
burning building, they will laugh twice as hard if the elephant has
to jump from twice as high.
Activists in every cause could be accused of committing the
same logical fallacy, presuming that if a problem is exaggerated or
described as a crisis it will get more attention, resulting in more
effective response.
However, Che Green, executive director of the Seattle-based
Humane Research Council, pointed out in the November 2006 edition of
the HRC newsletter Humane Thinking that, “According to a study
recently published by Britain’s Economic and Social Research Council,
the most effective strategies for encouraging behavior change are
those that are motivational and informative rather than negative,
such as those that induce fear, guilt, or regret.”
In other words, exaggerating a bad situation is not the best
way to make it better.

Read more

First Beijing dog purge in five years brings unprecedented rally

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, December 2006:
BEIJING–Either “The Year of the Dog” ended in Beijing with
the first major dog purge in the city since March 2001, or with the
introduction of world-standard animal sheltering and adoption
practices, depending on whether one asks activists or officials.
Possibly a bit of both happened.
The few certainties are that the dog laws enforced in
November 2006 by the Beijing Public Security Bureau, Agriculture
Bureau, and Administration for Industry & Commerce were of dubious
value in ensuring public safety; that the crackdown was openly
motivated by concern for keeping the streets clean and safe before
the 2008 Olympics; and that the outcome may have been “killing the
dog to scare the monkey,” as animal advocates gathered on November
11 outside the Beijing Zoo in a globally reported protest.

Read more

1 66 67 68 69 70 250