Editorial: Trust

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1996:

Building a humane world begins with building trust, the basic understanding that
permits peaceful interaction among living beings. Whether sharing a watering hole,
stroking a cat, or shaking hands on a deal, it starts with establishing mutual confidence that
vulnerability will not bring attack. Even infants must be able to trust their mothers before
they learn to reciprocate love; if infant trust is betrayed by neglect or violence, as the late
vivisector Harry Harlow showed through some of the most appalling experiments ever executed,
the capacity to engage in reciprocal relationships of any kind is lastingly impaired.
Trust in itself does not preclude violence, as even the most trustworthy humans
and animals may sometimes bite when they shouldn’t, but a climate of trust at least precludes
cruelty, since to do intentional harm is to erode trust.

Read more

Last of the dinosaurs

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1996:

NEW YORK––The world learned
last year what leading-edge paleontologists
began to whisper a decade ago––that the
dinosaurs were not reptiles but close kin to
birds, or more precisely, that birds are not
merely descendents but survivors of
Dinosauria, a living branch of the therapod
dinosaur family. Among the therapods were
Ornithomimus, actually named for resembling
a bird; Gallimimus, essentially a giant
ostrich; the hawk-like Oviraptors and
Velociraptors; and the Tyrannosaurids,
including Tyrannosaurus Rex.
“Yo, T-Rex!” chortled Newsweek.
“Your mama’s a turkey!”

Read more

Cutting euthanasias without conflict

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1996:

SAN DIEGO––Can population control euthanasias be halted?
Do homeless cats breed in the woods?
New studies by the National Pet Alliance and ANIMAL PEOPLE say yes to both
questions––and confirm that the keys to success are first, going where the homeless cats are
to do neutering, and second, working to enable renters to adopt cats.
Political conflicts erupting in Fort Wayne, Indiana, and Montgomery County,
Maryland, demonstrate meanwhile that harassing ordinary pet keepers with regulations and
extra fees may lower euthanasia numbers at cost of creating an eventually self-defeating backlash
against enforcement of any animal control or animal protection laws. In both cities, animal
advocates are digging in to protect nationally noted breeding control ordinances,
acclaimed when passed, but easy targets for newly elected fiscal conservatives, who recently
took over both civic administrations with a pledge to cut bureaucracy. The Fort Wayne city
council is contemplating closing the public animal control agency and contracting services

Read more

The price of Willy

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1996:

NEWPORT, Oregon––Keiko, the orca star of the
1993 film Free Willy!, was already the costliest, most controversial
whale in history long before he splashed into his
new surroundings, a $7 million state-of-the-art tank at the
Oregon Coast Aquarium. Enjoying four times the space he
had in his 11 years at the El Reino Aventura amusement park
in Mexico City, Keiko increased his activity so much as to
double his appetite within his first week of arrival, as the
biggest package ever flown by United Parcel Service.
But the successful relocation only escalated the
debate over whether and if Keiko can––or should––actually
be freed. Moving him was the easy part. There were disagreements
over who should move him, where, for what
purpose, but even El Reino Aventura general manager Oscar
Porter readily agreed in principle that he needed better quarters.

Read more

BOOKS: The Flight of the Osprey

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, January/February 1996:

The Flight of the Osprey, by Ewan Clarkson. St. Martin’s Press (175 5th
Ave., New York, NY 10010), 1995. 192 pages. $19.95, hardcover.

Nicola Fray is widowed at age 37.
Her late husband, a botanist, taught respect
for all creatures. But when fishery owner
Martin Collier beds and subsequently weds
her, after much dithery coyness on her part,
she not only learns to live happily with his
fishing, but has her eyes “opened” to the
“scientific” virtues of hunting.

Read more

BOOKS: Diary of a Cat

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, January/February 1996:

D i a ry of a Cat, by Leigh Rutledge.
Dutton (375 Hudson St., New York, NY
10014), 1995. $12.95, hardback.

After Dear Tabby, this book by the
same author may disappoint, because the
feline diarist focuses not on cats, but less
realistically, on human conversations and
activities. The details eventually merge into a
“fur-fetched” plot. For example, a mysterious
animal named Vlad, of unspecified
species, does in a villainous woman who gets
buried in the flower bed, and at the final
word of this book the deed has still presented
no problems. Some of the cats’ antics, while

Read more

BOOKS: Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, January/February 1996:

Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and
Nonhuman Animals, by Evelyn B. Pluhar. Duke University Press (Box
90660, Durham, NC 27708), 1995. 370 pages, index and bibliography, no discernible
price.

Add Beyond Prejudice to the dusty
mountains ground out by pedantic philosophical
debaters concerning the strained relations
between humankind and animals.
Pluhar is meticulous and thorough in
researching and presenting her
argument––over 300 pages of small
type––but does that justify yet another tome
on a subject long since picked to death?

Read more

BOOKS: The Dog Who Rescues Cats

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, January/February 1996:

The Dog Who Rescues Cats: The True Story of
G i n n y, by Philip Gonzalez and Lenore Fleischer. HarperCollins
(10 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022-5299),
1995. $16.00 hardback.
Imagine a tough Vietnam veteran, a laborer who lived to
spend, turning into a man who lives impoverished by choice, to
enable rescuing and nurturing the outcast cats of the Long Island
beach areas––not just lost housepets, but cats born feral and afflicted
with every kind of pest, disease, and defect, including some gruesomely
damaged by cruel people. He cherishes cats who are blind,
deaf, lacking hind feet, and one who is neurologically defective, and
tells us that even these can make loving and pleasure-giving friends
and companions. Living on disability pay after an accident took away
his job and his former physical freedom , this man spent nearly
$1,000 on only one of the many cats he continually sought veterinary
aid for, all the time feeding many feral cats and neutering all he could
catch.

Read more

No arrests, no charges, but lawsuit in Petaluma shelter case

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, January/February 1996:

PETALUMA, Calif.––Sonoma County district
attorney J. Michael Mullins on December 1 said there was no
evidence to support criminal charges pertaining to the operation
of the Petaluma animal shelter by Thunder and Lightning’s
Cause, but as 1995 ended, the shelter remained under interim
administration by the Humane Society of Sonoma County.

The Santa Rosa Press Democrat reported on
December 22 that the Petaluma city council “is considering terminating
TLC’s contract because of lingering concerns over
finances and recent complaints of animal mistreatment.”
Attorney Richard Day, representing TLC, reportedly
demanded after charges were not filed that TLC be put back in
charge of the shelter, that Petaluma compensate TLC for lost
income and legal fees, and that the city apologize for ousting
TLC from the shelter on November 8. According to the Press
Democrat, “The city’s settlement proposal apparently does not
include putting TLC back in control of the shelter.”
TLC won a three-year contract to run the shelter in
July, bidding $200,700; HSSC bid $226,000. TLC backers
allege that claims of mismanagement were concocted by city
officials who favored HSSC, which resumed running the shelter
on November 9.
ANIMAL PEOPLE heard of the eviction on
November 13 from Patricia Zimmerman, of Petaluma, who
said she and other TLC backers were calling media and animal
protection groups on behalf of TLC director Janet Coppini.
Requesting coverage, Zimmerman stated repeatedly that
Coppini had been “arrested” without charges and the shelter
shut by police. Zimmerman acknowledged “severe overcrowding”
at the shelter, but said a mobile unit to house cats was to
have been “plugged in” on November 9, and blamed cases of
kennel cough on the previous administration by HSSC.
ANIMAL PEOPLE editor Merritt Clifton advised
that Coppini and TLC should get legal counsel. Zimmerman
said they were having difficulty finding a local attorney who
didn’t have a business relationship with Petaluma. Clifton
asked if Coppini and/or TLC had called either animal law specialist
Larry Weiss, who has a background in criminal law, or
the Animal Legal Defense Fund, both with offices in nearby
towns. At Zimmerman’s request, Clifton provided their telephone
numbers.
Clifton requested TLC’s IRS Form 990; shelter statistics;
copies of the shelter contract bids; local press coverage;
and copies of any statements from either Coppini or TLC.
Zimmerman said she would ask Coppini what items could be
sent. While she did, Clifton faxed Weiss, advising him that
Zimmerman or Coppini might call. Already aware of the case,
Weiss confirmed by fax the particulars as stated in Clifton’s
note. Zimmerman called back to say Coppini had found a
lawyer, and that as much of the requested information as possible
would follow. She declined to give Coppini’s telephone
number, saying Coppini had been advised not to talk to media.
The promised information from Zimmerman and/or
Coppini never came, but based on extensive discussion of the
“arrest” and surrounding circumstances with Zimmerman, both
before and after her interruption of the conversation to call
Coppini, together with confirmation of many of the circumstances
via other sources, ANIMAL PEOPLE took brief
notice of the situation on page 17 of our December edition.
ion which said Coppini’s “attempt at no-kill animal
control apparently ended with her arrest over unspecified
alleged financial irregularities amid complaints about overcrowding
and disease in the shelter.” According to Noel, “Ms.
Coppini was not arrested, either as your article states or for any
other charge.” Noel concluded, “Please have your insurance
carrier contact me immediately. If a satisfactory resolution is
not concluded by noon, San Francisco time, December 29,
1995, we will file suit against you for compensatory and punitive
damages in San Francisco Superior Court.”
ANIMAL PEOPLE had been contacted for other reasons
by other people claiming to represent Coppini and/or TLC,
including Day earlier the same day, and was aware that Mullins
had ultimately decided not to file any charges against either
Coppini or anyone else involved with TLC. However, Noel’s
demand was our first information from any source that contrary
to Clifton’s understanding from Zimmerman, Coppini had not
been arrested.
ANIMAL PEOPLE responded, “We welcome Ms.
Coppini’s written statement, including as to the particulars of
her apparent disagreement with the statements of Ms.
Zimmerman on her behalf to ANIMAL PEOPLE.”
At deadline, ANIMAL PEOPLE had received no
statement from Coppini, but was notified by fax that Noel did
on December 29 file a defamation suit claiming, “Plaintiff had
not been arrested; plaintiff had not been arrested over alleged
financial irregularities; plaintiff had not been arrested over
alleged financial irregularities amid complaints about overcrowding
and disease in the Petaluma Animal Shelter.”
ANIMAL PEOPLE has retained a nationally noted
attorney to defend if the suit is actually served.
–––CORRECTION–––
An independent source has confirmed that Janet
Coppini was not arrested. We are pleased to correct the statement
that Janet Coppini was arrested, which, though erroneous,
was made in good faith, according to the best information
available to us at that time.
Recently obtained copies of coverage of the Petaluma
shelter dispute published by the Press-Democrat and the
Petaluma Argus-Courier confirm that the police seizure of the
shelter was due to unspecified alleged financial irregularities
amid complaints about overcrowding and disease. Both papers
discussed an ongoing criminal investigation of business practices
from their editions of November 10 until after Mullins’
December 1 decision not to file charges. Public discussion of
overcrowding and disease in the Petaluma Animal Shelter surfaced
in the A r g u s – C o u r i e r of November 10, and continued
intermittently in both papers at least through December 22,
when the Argus-Courier reported that according to a statement
by TLC veterinarian Jona Sun Jordan, “accusations by HSSC
director Dan Knapp that animals were improperly kenneled,
sick animals were put in with healthy ones, two dogs had kennel
cough, kennels weren’t cleaned and were overcrowded are
not true.” The Press-Democrat carried similar but briefer coverage
of Jordan’s statement.

1 510 511 512 513 514 648