Going “gently” to slaughter

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2001:

 

NEW YORK CITY, WASHINGTON D.C., BRUSSELS–Osama bin Laden
told the 19 terrorists who killed at least 5,690 people on September
11 to seize the aircraft they used as weapons by cutting the throats
of their first victims in the manner of hallal slaughter.
The bin Laden document was published by The New York Times
and closely reviewed by expert commentators, as the October 2001
ANIMAL PEOPLE editorial discusses (page 3)–except that the experts
did not menton hallal, the central metaphor in it. They did not
talk about the significance of bin Laden emphasizing that his suicide
attackers were to think of themselves as butchers and the people they
killed as meat.

Read more

Firebombings at Coulston, BLM boost calls for crackdown

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2001:

 

ALAMOGORDO, New Mexico; LITCHFIELD, Calif.; SALT LAKE
CITY, Utah; LONDON, U.K.–As if on cue to ensure that animal
rights activism rates a high priority in the “war on terrorism,”
unknown persons on September 21 torched a storage building 200 feet
from the main chimpanzee facility at the Coulston Foundation in
Alamogordo, New Mexico, and on October 15 burned a hay barn at the
Bureau of Land Management’s Litchfield Wild Horse and Burro Corrals,
21 miles northeast of Susanville, California.

Read more

Court Calendar

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2001:

Dog cases
A three-judge panel of the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled 2-1 on October 11 that police officers may be held liable for
damages if they kill a stray dog who poses no danger to life or
property. The verdict reinstated a case filed by Kim and David Brown
of Reading, Pennsylvania, against Muhlenberg Township police
officer Robert D. Eberly, who on April 28, 1998 shot their
three-year-old Rottweiler as Kim Brown screamed “No!” The dog
wandered outside as the Browns moved furniture.

Read more

BOOKS: Canned Hunts: Unfair at Any Price

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2001:

Canned Hunts: Unfair At Any Price
by Diana Norris, Norm Phelps, & D.J. Schubert
(with other Fund for Animals staff)
Fund for Animals (200 West 57th St., New York, NY 10019), 2001.
64 pages, paperback. $5.00. [May also be downloaded, for free,
at <www.fund.org>.]

“Canned hunts,” in which animals are raised and shot witbin
fenced bounds, present an ethical paradox.
Amounting almost literally to shooting fish in a barrel,
they belie the pretense of the participants to being “sportsmen.” At
larger facilities, the animals may be able to run and
hide–briefly–but they can’t run far, and the “guide” knows the
hiding places. Even the biggest canned hunt is much like an Easter
egg hunt, except that the object is dead animals instead of dyed
eggs.

Read more

1 2 3