LAB SHORTS

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 1995:

Using pigs to grow spare parts
for humans came closer to reality with
the late April announcements that a team
at the Lahey Hitchcock Clinic in
Burlington, Massachusetts, had trans-
planted pig tissue into the brain of a 59-
year-old man in hopes of reversing
Parkinson’s disease, while a team at Duke
University created genetically engineered
pigs whose bodies include two human pro-
teins that prevent hyperacute tissue rejec-
tion. “In societies where animals are
killed in the tens of millions for food,”
wrote Dr. John Favre of the London
University Institute of Child Health, in a
Nature Medicine editorial accompanying
publication of the Duke data, “it would be
difficult to argue on ethical grounds for a
proscription on the killing of a tiny num-
ber of pigs to save the lives and restore the
health of sick and dying patients.”

Read more

Monkey wars

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 1995:

The German airline Lufthansa, the world’s leading
international wildlife hauler, announced May 11 that it will no
longer book cargoes of monkeys and apes destined for labora-
tory use, and will entirely cease transporting nonhuman primates
for laboratory suppliers as soon as it is authorized to do so by the
German transport ministry––probably by mid-June. The decision
was attributed to humane concerns, and comes after years of
protest over alleged high death rates among monkeys flown to
Europe and the U.S. from Indonesia, the Philippines, and Africa.
The British Union Against Vivisection charged in 1992 that the
transport mortality rate for monkeys from Indonesia averaged 19%,
while mortality among monkeys from the Philippines averaged 6%.
Monkey shipments from Africa dwindled after 1989 due to concern
over the accidental importation of the Ebola virus to a laboratory in
Reston, Virginia. While the Lufthansa announcement made no
mention of Ebola virus, it did coincide with rising global concern
over the current Ebola outbreak in Zaire. It also came six weeks
after two monkeys en route to the U.S. from Sudan were found to
have both AIDS and tuberculosis upon arrival in New York, and
were flown back to Cairo, Egypt, before being euthanized.

Read more

Bird strike testing

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 1995:

CINCINNATI––General Electric Aircraft Engines pub-
licist Jim Stump recently contacted ANIMAL PEOPLE to set the
record straight about the methodology of bird-strike testing, the
subject of letter campaigns by various groups based on somewhat
garbled accounts in a variety of newspapers and trade publications.
The first misconception of the letter-writers, Stump
pointed out, is that GE is at liberty to halt the testing. “Bird-strike
testing is conducted, with other often rigorous testing, during the
development of a new engine,” he explained, “in accordance with
requirements established by agencies such as the U.S. Federal
Aviation Administration and the International Civil Aviation
Organization. Flight safety is a primary objective, but some of the
testing relates to such matters as reducing noise and emissions.”
While the regulatory agencies still require some bird-
strike testing, GE favors the principles of reduction, refinement,
and replacement, Stump indicated. “GE Aircraft Engines pays
$15,000 annually to support and participate, with other manufac-
turers and agencies associated with the aviation industry, in the
International Bird Strike Research Group,” he wrote, “which is
trying to develop artificial birds that will be universally acceptable
for use in engine testing. Under the auspices of the Group, the
actual research on critical areas such as body density is being con-
ducted by the Central Science Laboratory, an executive agency of
Great Britain’s Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food.”

Read more

In league with the devil?! P&G REDUCES ANIMAL USE 53% IN 10 YEARS–– WHILE TRIPLING IN SIZE––YET HEARS LITTLE PRAISE

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 1995:

CINCINNATI––Say anything good about Procter &
Gamble and you’ll be accused of dancing with the devil. Take it
from the anonymously printed and distributed flyer ANIMAL PEO-
PLEreceived while researching this article:
“The President of Procter & Gamble appeared on the Phil
Donahue Show on March 1, 1995. He announced that due to the
openness of our society, he was coming out of the closet about his
association with the Church of Satan. He stated that a large portion
of the profits from Procter & Gamble products go to support this
satanic church. When asked by Donahue if stating this on television
would hurt his business, he replied, ‘There are not enough
Christians in the U.S. to make a difference.’”

Read more

The Monkey Wars

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, May 1995:

The Monkey Wars
by Deborah Blum
Oxford University Press (200 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016),
1994. 306 pages, cloth, $25.00.
Based on a Pultizer Prize-winning
investigative series published in 1991 by the
Sacramento Bee, The Monkey Wars is the
fairest, most comprehensive look yet at pri-
mate research and related protest. Author
Deborah Blum gained access to many of the
most controversial researchers and laborato-
ries in the United States. She describes from
first-hand observation the exploratory brain
surgery of Stuart Zola-Morgan, for instance,
combining appreciation of his findings with
discussion of the moral issues that have led
the activist community to brand him “Dr.
Zola-Morbid.”

Read more

ANIMALS IN LABORATORIES

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, May 1995:

Chimpanzee expert Dr. Jane Goodall, Henry Spira of
Animal Rights International, Holly Hazard of the Doris Day Animal
League, and Wayne Pacelle of the Humane Society of the U.S. are to
speak at the 1995 National Association for Biomedical Research con-
ference on May 1, in a forum moderated by Franklin Loew, dean of
the Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine. The forum was organized,
NABR said, when “Prompted by her open letter calling for public
forums on the use of animals in research and education, NABR asked
Dr. Goodall to address some of the complex ethical questions and other
issues she raised.” Wrote Goodall, at the urging of ANIMAL PEO-
PLE subscriber Walter Miale, “Animal experiments are conducted for
reasons such as advancing knowledge and curing disease. But treating
our fellow creatures as we do, on the scale we do, raises critical ques-
tions. Failure to examine them honestly is a failure of our own humani-
ty. Many areas of discussion do not resolve neatly into black and
white,” she added. “Learning from and reasoning with those who do
not share our views is one way we grow.” Miale, an independent envi-
ronmental researcher who lives in Philipsburg, Quebec, has worked to
start dialogue among activists and scientists since 1989.

Read more

LEMSIP’S LAST STAND: MOOR-JANKOWSKI FIGHTS FOR CHIMPS

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, April 1995:

STERLING FOREST, New York––One would think New York University

wouldn’t want to fight with Jan Moor-Jankowski. As a youth, he fought the Nazis in occu-

pied Poland. As a researcher, he’s battled disease for 30 years at his Laboratory for

Experimental Medicine and Surgery in Primates (LEMSIP), widely considered the world’s

most advanced in primate care––and the most accessible to people who care about primates.

As a humanitarian, he was among the first researchers to adopt the principles of “reduction,

refinement, and replacement” as his laboratory policy toward animals. As editor of the pres-

tigious International Journal of Primatology, Moor-Jankowski from 1983 until 1991 battled

a libel suit filed by the Austrian pharmaceutical firm Immuno AG, in response to a letter-to-

the-editor authored by Shirley McGreal of the International Primate Protection League.

Paying expenses largely from his own pocket, Moor-Jankowski won landmark victories for

press freedom in the Supreme Court and New York Court of Appeals.

Yet despite Moor-Jankowski’s for-

midable reputation, NYU has moved to dis-

mantle LEMSIP in apparent retaliation for his

criticism of drug addiction experiments con

ducted by fellow NYU primate researcher

Ronald Wood. Moor-Jankowski in turn has

delayed his scheduled retirement for at least a

year to fight for the lives of the 225 chim-

panzees in LEMSIP custody.

Smouldering for months, the con-

flict erupted on August 16, 1994, when

Moor-Jankowski resigned from the

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

that oversees Wood’s work, in protest of what

he terms “highly reprehensible” conduct that

“must be stopped.” Moor-Jankowski isn’t

allowed to discuss details, under IACUC rules

of confidentiality, but according to the fal

1994 edition of the American SPCA magazine

Animal Watch, “NYU sources claim Wood’s

studies involve extreme negligence and animal

cruelty, and have prompted temporary sus-

pension of Wood’s experiments last spring,

the resignation of former NYU head veterinar-

ian Dr. Wendell Niemann, the firing of sever-

al people with direct knowledge of wrongdo-

ing possibly because of their ‘whistleblower’

status, and two federal investigations.”

Weeks later, Moor-Jankowski

recalls, “I was shocked to learn that NYU

intended to dispose of LEMSIP,” which he

founded in 1965 and had run under NYU aus-

pices since 1967. On August 23, 1994, NYU

had without Moor-Jankowski’s knowledge

informed the USDA, which enforces the

Animal Welfare Act, that LEMSIP was no

longer a “site of the NYU Medical Center.”

The import of that, Moor-Jankowski

explains, is that while he personally raises

LEMSIP’s annual budget of $4 million, mostly

from industry, “The money goes through NYU.

As soon as I started opposing Wood’s experi-

ments, the money was withheld, jeopardizing

our ability to meet USDA standards.”

Elaborates Suzanne Roy of In

Defense of Animals, “Moor-Jankowski had

arranged for over $450,000 in funds from the

U.S. Army to underwrite the establishment of a

chimpanzee retirement facility in South Texas.”

Also to house retired LEMSIP chimps, the

facility was to be run by the Buckshire

Corporation, whose president, Glen Wrigley,

rattled the research establishment by filing a

brief in support of Moor-Jankowski and

McGreal during the Immuno case. The contract

was to cover lifetime care for 12 chimps, all

over 30 years old, formerly used in military

experiments at the Delta Regional Primate

Center in Louisiana. Those projects ceased in

1991. Three of the chimps are now at the

Buckshire headquarters in Pennsyvlania, while

LEMSIP has five; four remain at Delta.

“But NYU wouldn’t sign the deal,”

Moor-Jankowski continues. “They wanted to

keep the money. And they wanted to fire me,

but they couldn’t, so they fired the lab.”

While Moor-Jankowski pursued the

transfer of LEMSIP to the Aaron Diamond

Foundation, a longtime sponsor, preparatory to

his own retirement, NYU associate dean David

Scotch “appears to have actively courted the

participation of Fred Coulston in a takeover

plan,” Wisconsin Regional Primate Center

librarian Larry Jacobsen charged in a February

9 posting on Primate-talk, an Internet bulletin

board for primatologists. University of

California at San Diego anthropologist Jim

Moore backed the posting on February 14 with

an extensive bibliography of sources.

Neither NYU representatives nor

Coulston have been willing to discuss the situa-

tion in detail with media.

Coulston

Coulston, 80, is owner of the White

Sands Research Center in Alamogordo, New

Mexico, and founder of the Coulston Found-

ation, sited at nearby Holloman Air Force Base,

which keeps 140 chimps left over or descended

from the NASA “space monkey” program of the

1950s and early 1960s. Since Coulston took

over the Holloman facility in June 1993, three

chimps died from overheating on October 31,

1993; four macaques died of bloat and vomit-

ing on June 14, 1994, their first day in outdoor

housing; two chimps died in July 1994, one of

apparent untreated pneumonia and meningitis,

the other of apparent oversedation for a routine

physical; and in December 1994, according to

Jacobsen, “An as yet unrevealed number of

monkeys died of thirst and dehydration in a

room where the water was shut off.”

A staffing ratio of one person per 33

primates, criticized by the National Institutes of

Health in a June 1994 site visit report, may

have contributed to the deaths. “The report also

notes that the Coulston

Foundation veterinary

staff is too small, largely

undertrained and inexpe-

rienced,” Jacobsen said.

Between his two

facilities, Coulston

already has about 540

Chimps and

800 macaques. He reportedly

offered NYU $1 million

for LEMSIP, the acquisi-

tion of which would give

him more than half the lab chimps in the U.S.

“This,” observed Jacobsen, “despite the fact

the Coulston’s enterprises in New Mexico are

marginal financially.”

At deadline, Moor-Jankowski hoped

criticism of a possible deal with Coulston from

other scientists might make NYU back off.

PETA

Meanwhile, according to Roy, “a

PETA undercover investigation has shown

Buckshire is in serious violation of the Animal

Welfare Act in both its chimpanzee housing

area, where conditions are at best bleak, and its

cat colony.” In February, the USDA cited

Buckshire for housing chimps in undersized

cages and failing to provide adequate medical

care––situations Moor-Jankowski attributes to

the NYU hold on the funding.

In mid-March, Army Medical

Research Acquisition Department director

Gregory Doyle ordered NYU to remove the

chimps from Buckshire.

In between, on February 24, Wrigley

offered to sell PETA all the chimps to which

Buckshire holds title. PETA refused the offer

on February 27. However, wrote PETA direc-

tor of research, investigations, and rescue

Mary Beth Sweetland, “We are always willing,

in conjunction with the Great Ape Project and

the Chimpanzee Rescue Centre [an English

s a n c t u a r y ] , to talk about a donative transfer.

Perhaps a condition under which Buckshire is

released from providing for the chimpanzees’

lifetime care would make such a transfer more

attractive to you.”

“We have 40 adult chimps,”

Buckshire spokesperson Sharon Hersh told

ANIMAL PEOPLE, “ranging from 13 to 35

years of age, who would be able to leave their

current situation for residence outside of the

research community. We have assigned costs

ranging from $12,000 to $18,000, depending

upon their breeding status. Many are ex-per-

forming chimps who had worked with trainers.

Some were part of a large group imported from

Africa for breeding in the late 1960s. Others

were born within the research community. We

would entertain selling specific animals.”

Low AMPs

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, April 1995:

Americans for Medical Progress, an
anti-animal rights group funded by U.S. Surgical,
has grudgingly apologized for a February 24
claim that former Olympic diver Greg Louganis
betrays fellow AIDS patients by doing ads for a
group called PAWS, which AMP misidentified
as the Progressive Animal Welfare Society. That
PAWS opposes animal use in biomedical
research. “It has come to AMP’s attention,” a
February 28 retraction said, “that the group for
which Mr. Louganis is a spokesperson is Pets Are
Wonderful Support,” which assists pet owners
with AIDS in the Philadelphia area.
“A common tactic used by animal
rights groups to deceive the public,” the AMP
statement continued, “is to adopt names or
acronyms of respectable groups.” AMP may owe
all concerned another apology: founded in 1967,
the Progressive Animal Welfare Society is the
older group by 25 years.

BOOKS: White Eye

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1995:

White Eye, by Blanche D’Alpuget. Simon & Schuster (1230 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, NY 10020), 1994. 254 pages, hardcover. $22.00 U.S.,
$28.50 Canadian.
Seldom have I found a murder
mystery as satisfying as Blanche
D’Alpuget’s White Eye––not only first-rate
suspense, but educational to boot. A grant
from the Literary Arts Board of the
Australia Council allowed the author to
spend two years researching international
wildlife trafficking, genetic engineering,
wild bird rehabilitation, and biomedical
research on primates—among other sub-
jects. Judging from D’Alpuget’s portrayal
of the illicit wildlife trade and primate
research, about which I’m relatively well
versed, she seems to have mastered the
topics. Her description of raptor rehabilita-
tion and release, about which I knew little,
is fascinating. Passages dealing with genet-
ic engineering, which heretofore has left
me totally confused, actually brought me a
glimmer of understanding.

Read more

1 30 31 32 33 34 39