From ANIMAL PEOPLE, November 2004:

Species Link: The Journal of Interspecies Telepathic Communication
Quarterly, $25/year, c/o Anima Mundi Incorporated
(P.O. Box 1060, Point Reyes, CA 94956; <www.animaltalk.net>.)

A skeptic might ask why telepaths need a periodical, when
they have telepathy.
Why do any of us need paper and filing cabinets, when we
have computers?
Telepathy alone, if it existed, might be sufficient to
share ideas, contact information, and details of coming events,
but even the most powerful communicating mind might become cluttered
and confused if obliged to archive and organize the sort of
information gathered and shared for 56 editions so far by Species
Link editor Penelope Smith.
Further, not everyone interested in telepathy is a telepath–yet.
Smith and others believe “animal communication” can be taught and
learned. Many of the Species Link participants believe that they are
telepaths, but some do not. Many others hold a more practical and
quantifiable perspective on how wordless communication with animals
occurs.

Read more

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2004:

Animal Rights:
A very short introduction
by David DeGrazia
Oxford University Press
(198 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016), 2002. 131 pp., paperback. $9.95.

In just 116 pages George Washington University professor
David DeGrazia reviews the different schools of thought within the
animal rights movement, and then examines three of the more
contentious issues: meat eating, zoos, and biomedical research.
De Grazia presents the concepts, arguments and counter
arguments as well as possible within the constraints of brevity.
morality of animal rights.
–Chris Mercer & Bev Pervan

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2004:

The Case for Animal Rights, 2004 edition
by Tom Regan
University of Calif. Press
(2120 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704), 2004.
425 pages, paperback. $21.95.

Moral philosophy tends to cause the general reader to either
fall asleep or develop a headache.
Knowing this, Tom Regan in 2002 produced a demystified,
simplified version of his 1983 volume The Case for Animal Rights,
entitled Empty Cages. That is the book for the general reader.
The Case for Animal Rights, 2004 edition is primarily a
textbook for moral philosophy students. Regan responds in an updated
preface to some of the criticisms of the first edition.
Most thoughtful people consider how much they should adjust
their lifestyles to avoid causing animal suffering. Typically this
judgement proceeds from personal intuition. But beliefs coming from
such a subjective and emotional origin are not necessarily convincing
to others, and do not provide a consistent approach to resolving
moral conflict when the resolution must be translated into public law
or policy.

Read more