Did Japan quit killing hawksbill turtles to resume killing whales?

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

TOKYO, Japan––More than
three years after former U.S. president
George Bush warned Japan to quit dealing in
hawksbill sea turtles or face trade sanctions
under the Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species, Japan on July 15
banned the import of the rare turtles and/or
their parts––after importing circa 30 tons of
hawksbill turtleshell during the first half of
1994 alone. The shells are used to make var-
ious ornamental sundries. The Bush warn-
ing, never followed up, was the first-ever
U.S. move to enforce CITES, although
Congress gave the President the authority to
do so in 1977. Japan is believed to have
imported parts of more than two million sea
turtles since 1971, according to Earth Island
Institute, including the shells of at least
234,000 hawksbills during the 1980s.

Read more

Sea Shepherd, Greenpeace take on Norwegian whalers; JAPAN IGNORES SANCTUARY; RUSSIA MAY FOLLOW

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

NORTH SEA, TOKYO–––As a
summer of intense whaling and anti-whaling
activity off Norway closed, Japan announced
on August 12 that it too would flout the
International Whaling Commission by taking
an “exception” to the Southern Ocean Whale
Sanctuary, created in May. A similar
announcement was expected from Russia.
While Norway for the second year
unilaterally set a commercial whaling quota,
breaking the IWC moratorium on commercial
whaling in effect since 1986, Japan formally
objected to the inclusion of minke whales as a
protected species within the newly created
sanctuary, which includes 80% of the known
minke whale habitat: all waters south of the
40th parallel except for a dip around South
America. The objection means Japan will
proceed with plans for a so-called scientific
hunt of 300 minke whales within the sanctu-

Read more

Endangered Species Act package includes wolves for Yellowstone

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, July/August 1994:

WASHINGTON D.C.––The Fish-
eries and Wildlife subcommittee of the U.S.
Senate Environment and Public Works
Committee opened discussion of reauthorizing
the Endangered Species Act on June 15 amid
a flurry of actions by the Clinton administra-
tion designed to mitigate objections to the
ESA from landowners while convincing envi-
ronmentalists that the key goals of the act will
not be yielded for political advantage.
Most notably, Interior Secretary
Bruce Babbitt announced June 14 that effec-
tive upon publication of new ESA regulations
in the Federal Register, it will institute peer
review of species listing and recovery deci-
sions by panels of three independent scien-
tists; produce multispecies listings and recov-
ery plans for species sharing the same ecosys-
tem, to expedite the regulatory process; pub-
lish land use guidelines spelling out what is
and isn’t allowed in the habitat of each new
species listed; and most symbolically impor-
tant, add landowners and business representa-
tives to endangered species recovery planning
teams. The latter comes close to building into
the listing process the cost/benefit analysis
that the George Bush administration argued
should be part of endangered species decision-
making back when the ESA first came up for
renewal in 1992.

Read more

Whales for missiles: SANCTUARY CREATED––BUT WHALING GETS THE GO-AHEAD TOO

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, July/August 1994:

PUERTO VALLARTA, Mexico, and WASH-
INGTON D.C.––As whale defenders cheered the May 26 cre-
ation of the Southern Whale Sanctuary around Antarctica, the
International Whaling Commission on May 27 unanimously
approved a U.S. motion to provisionally accept the Revised
Management Plan, a formula for setting renewed commercial
whaling quotas. Mexico, Ireland, and India voiced reserva-
tions but did not formally oppose the consensus.
The Southern Whale Sanctuary starts at the 40th par-
allel south latitude, dipping to the 55th parallel around the
lower tip of South America. It connects with the extant Indian
Ocean Whale Sanctuary. Although the IWC has no policing
power, the sanctuary designation means that whaling is per-
manently illegal in approximately half of the world’s waters,
protecting––on paper––about 80% of the surviving baleen
whales, an estimated 80% of the time.

Read more

COURT CALENDAR

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, July/August 1994:

Activism
The U.S. Supreme Court on
June 13 upheld federal court and Court
of Appeals rulings that communities
cannot consititutionally ban the display
of political signs on citizens’ own prop-
erty. Issued on behalf of anti-Persian Gulf
War protester Margaret Gilleo, of Ladue,
Missouri, who is now a Congressional
candidate, the ruling applies as well to
people who have been ordered to cease
displaying signs on behalf of animals.
Friends of Animals in early
June won a judgement against the State
of Alaska for attorney’s fees incurred in
defending itself against governor Walter
Hickel’s failed attempt to sue FoA for libel.
The Hickel suit was filed in June 1993 in
an apparent attempt to prevent FoA from
further publicizing the Alaskan plan to kill
wolves in order to make more moose and
caribou available to hunters.

Read more

Birds

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, July/August 1994:

Bald eagle recovery in New
York and New Jersey reached milestones
this spring, as the former had 24 nesting
pairs and the latter five, up from one
apiece when DDT was banned in 1972.
Before the introduction of DDT, which
built up in the food chain and caused the
females to lay brittle eggs, New York had
75 pairs; New Jersey had 20 to 25. The
current population are descended from 198
eagles imported from Alaska between
1976 and 1988, plus 60 from Manitoba,
who were released between 1983 and
1988. Of the original 198, 32 are known
dead––half of them shot by vandals––and
another 32 are known to have reached
maturity and paired at least once. Eagles
from that group have now settled in seven
states. Curiously, half of the pairs who
have nested within New York state have
chosen trees that were documented nesting
sites around the end of the 19th century.

Read more

AGRICULTURE

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, July/August 1994:

At deadline Washington D.C. sources believed
a Justice Department probe of accusations that Agriculture
Secretary Mike Espy improperly accepted free travel, foot-
ball tickets, and other favors from the Tyson poultry empire
would end without charges being filed. However, Bob
Gottsch, a leading Nebraska cattle feeder, on June 14 sued
Espy for $22 million in damages, alleging Espy unfairly
favored poultry over beef in strengthening sanitary require-
ments for beef slaughterhouses without likewise regulating
poultry slaughterers. Ironically, Espy was editorially hit the
same week by The New York Times for purportedly favoring
beef by exempting hamburger from a requirement that meat
product labels must accurately describe fat content.
Despite recent improvements, the USDA meat
inspection system “is only marginally better today at pro-
tecting the public from harmful bacteria than it was a year
ago or even 87 years ago when it was first put in place,”
General Accounting Office food and agriculture chief John
Harmon told Congress on May 25.

Read more

Concessions to hunters win assault rifle ban

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 1994:

WASHINGTON D.C.
The National Rifle Association took
the biggest defeat it has ever suffered
at the federal level in the House of
Representatives on May 5, as Indiana
Democrat Andrew Jacobs Jr. switched
his “no” vote to a “yes,” passing into
law a ban on 19 types of assault rifle,
which though backed by the Clinton
administration, had been expected to
fail by at least 15 votes.
Clinton bought the victory
with a string of concessions to the
hunting lobby. The assault rifle ban,
for instance, names 650 hunting
weapons and mandates that none shall
be outlawed during the 10 years the
assault rifle ban is to be in effect.

Read more

MARINE MAMMAL NOTES

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 1994:
The Marine Mammal Protection Act was
reauthorized on schedule on April 29, including loop-
holes to let hunters to import polar bear trophies and to
allow the killing of seals and sea lions who eat threat-
ened fish runs at locks and fish ladders. Other provi-
sions include a total ban on intentionally shooting
marine mammals who interfere with fishing, and a pro-
gram to cut accidental kills during fishing to near zero
over the next seven years.
The Liberal Party of Canada convention on
May 15 overwhelmingly adopted a resolution calling
for the resumption of offshore seal hunting, halted in
1983 after two decades of international protest. The
Liberals form the Parliamentary majority. Claiming
“the concerns of animal rights lobby groups should not
be put before the concerns of the people of
Newfoundland and Labrador,” the resolution claims
sealing is needed to create jobs because the fishing
industry has collapsed––making no mention that the col-
lapse was caused by overfishing condoned in the name
of job creation by a succession of both Liberal and
Progressive-Conservative governments.

Read more

1 45 46 47 48 49 54