Was it a rescue––or a theft?

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

WADSWORTH, Ohio– The
samoyed/chow paced the dark garage. A
broken chain, wired together, cut into his
neck. He suffered from heartworms. His
overgrown toenails curled downward, and
his fur was matted with feces. Feeding and
watering were irregular. His mother had
died the year before in that same garage.
Brian Gilligan, 36, felt com-
pelled to act. Frustrated with “weak state
laws that humane officers must follow,” he
says, he took the dog in January 1993.
Veterinary records document the
dog’s condition. His “overall appearance
was poor because of neglect,” according to
Larry Markley, DVM, who performed an
examination and provided treatment.

Read more

COURT CALENDAR

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

Humane Enforcement
The toughest cruelty sentence ever
issued in Vermont went to Donald Bliss, of
Barre, on a December 14 plea bargain. Bliss
admitted to keeping a starving Belgian mare staked
outside for most of the winter of 1992-1993. He
drew a year in jail with immediate probation, a
suspended fine of $2,000, was ordered to donate
$1,000 to the Central Vermont Humane Society,
and was obliged to pay the town of Barre $1,100
for boarding the mare until she was adopted by
Anne Cole Butler, of Orange.

Read more

Poachers

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

California wardens on
January 28 broke up the Ace
Hunting Club, a bear poaching ring
allegedly run by William Jim Taek
Lee, 35. Trophy hunters paid Lee
$1,500 apiece to be guided to bears;
Lee then sold bear parts both local-
ly and to Korea. The operation
reportedly killed 30 bears and net-
ted $600,000 In a parallel but
apparently unrelated case, t h e
Pennsylvania Game Commission
five days later charged Tae-Ukand
Elaine S. Kang of Coatesville,
Pennsylvania, with illegally traf-
ficking in bear galls.

Read more

SPECTACLES

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

A group of Ecuadoran school children
in late January donated their allowances, sold toys,
and performed on street corners to raise funds to
feed polar bears, elephants, seals, and horses aban-
doned in Quito by the Circus of Czars, from St.
Petersburg, Russia. The circus manager vanished
with the receipts from a successful tour, leaving the
human performers stranded, as creditors seized
their equipment. As ANIMAL PEOPLE went to
press, help was reportedly en route from business
leaders and environmental groups.

Read more

Fur

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

While the ISO moved to accept
padded leghold traps as “humane,” a
Massachusetts judge ruled they are not on
December 27, 1993, overturning a 1989 rul-
ing by the state Division of Fisheries and
Wildlife that padded traps were not banned by
the state law that banned steel-jawed leghold
traps in 1974. “It is apparent from the opera-
tion of the Woodstream ‘soft-catch’ trap,”
Suffolk Superior Court judge Patrick King
wrote, “that it will cause injury to many ani-
mals.”

Read more

Animal Control & Rescue

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

The Canadian SPCA
was stunned February 3 when it
lost the Montreal pound contract
to a private bidder, Berger Blanc,
for at least a two-month trial period.
Berger Blanc handles animal control
for several Montreal suburbs, but
has been accused of selling animals
to biomedical research. The
Montreal contract forbids such sales.
The CSPCA was nearly bankrupted
under its previous two-year pound
contract, loosely modeled after the
contract New York City has long
had with the ASPCA, under which
it was expected to provide pound
service at a substantial loss––
$450,000 in 1993––in exchange for
the proceeds from all dog licenses
sold after the first 10,000.

Read more

Woofs and growls

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

Who gets the money?
Animal and habitat protection
groups currently failing to meet the National
Charities Information Bureau’s wise giving
standards include the Cousteau Society, the
National Anti-Vivisection Society, the
National Humane Education Society and
PETA. The Cousteau Society and NAVS
flunked on criteria designed to prevent nepo-
tism and material conflicts of interest among
board members and administrators; the
Cousteau Society also flunked for excessive
fundraising expense; NHES flunked for lack
of accountability and excessive fundraising
expense; and PETA flunked for having only
three board members instead of the requisite
five. Additionally, the NCIB questions
whether Humane Society of the U.S. fundrais-
ing costs are reasonable relative to income.

Read more

Texas to refile vs. Primarily Primates

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS–
Texas assistant attorney general John Vinson
on January 14 filed a federal court petition
seeking to return jurisdiction over complaints
against Primarily Primates to state court, in
order to reinstate a suit seeking to remove
Primarily Primates president Wally Swett and
secretary Stephen Tello from the administra-
tion of the San Antonio-based sanctuary.
Vinson alleged that Swett hadn’t met the
terms of an out-of-court settlement reached in
November. As the terms were eventually
finalized, Swett was to undertake structural
revisions to the Primarily Primates bylaws
which would take away a defacto veto he had
held over board decisions; was to pay the
Texas attorney general’s office partial reim-
bursement from Primarily Primates of costs
incurred in handling the case, in the amount
of $15,000; and was to expand the Primarily
Primates board to nine members, including
“at least two persons from the San Antonio
area and a veterinarian or someone with for-
mal animal care training.”

Read more

PETA wins Berosini reversal

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1994:

RENO, Nevada––The Nevada Supreme Court
on January 27 emphatically reversed the $4.2 million libel
verdict won by orangutan trainer Bobby Berosini in
August 1990 against People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals, PETA director of investigations Jeanne Roush,
the Performing Animal Welfare Society, PAWS execu-
tive director Pat Derby, and dancer Ottavio Gesmundo.
Berosini contended that a videotape Gesmundo
secretly recorded backstage was false and defamatory.
The videotape was given to mass media by PETA, while
Derby commented upon it for Entertainment Tonight.
However, in a strongly worded 32-page opinion, the
four judges who reviewed the case concluded unanimous-
ly that, “The videotape is not false because it is an accu-
rate portrayal of the manner in which Berosini disciplined
his animals backstage before performances. The video-
tape is not defamatory because Berosini and his witnesses
take the position that the shaking, punching, and beating
that appear on the tape are necessary, appropriate and
justified for the training, discipline, and control of show
animals. If Berosini did not think that the tape showed
him doing anything wrong or disgraceful,” the decision
continued, “he should not be heard to complain that the
defendants defamed him merely by showing the tape.”

Read more

1 151 152 153 154 155 169