RODEO

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

California Assembly Bill 49x, to ban
horsetripping––a staple of charro rodeo at
deadline awaited only governor Pete Wilson’s
signature to become law. Calls of support for the
bill may be made to 916-445-2864.
The Animal Rights Foundation of
Florida asks that letters protesting Dr. Pepper’s
use of rodeo themes in ads be sent to John Clark,
Senior V.P. for Advertising, Dr. Pepper USA,
8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, TX 75231.
Members of In Defense of Animals
attempted a sit-in August 12 to protest a cattle
drive through the streets of Napa, California,
held to promote the Napa Town and Country Fair
rodeo. They were nearly trampled––along with
spectators––when the supposedly expert cowboys
lost control of the herd of 25 longhorn steers
about a block before reaching the demonstrators.

Read more

Bernstein lays down LASPCA law

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

LOS ANGELES––Hired to
revamp the Los Angeles SPCA, executive
director Madeleine Bernstein is already
dodging backstabs from some of the board,
which in April pushed Bernstein’s prede-
cessor, Ed Cubrda, into retirement after 25
years. In July, American Humane
Association west coast office director Betty
Denny Smith quietly quit the board, after
11 years. Soon afterward at least one other
board member intimated to media that
Smith quit because of Bernstein’s policies,
which Smith denied, and issued other
charges about Bernstein’s activity that fact-
checking soon disproved.

Read more

ANIMAL HEALTH

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

No face-branding halt yet despite what mass media reported
July 7 media reports that the USDA would no longer require face-branding of steers import-
ed from Mexico were incorrect. Such an announcement was expected, but was apparently delayed by
the White House to get input on the rules change from the National Cattlemen’s Association. The
USDA did amend the import rules for Mexican heifers, who now must be given a local anesthetic
prior to spaying, and are rump-branded. The steers are branded to help inspectors backtrack cattle car-
rying bovine tuberculosis; the heifers are spayed to prevent the transmission of brucellosis.

Read more

ASPCA gets eye––and doesn’t like it

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

NEW YORK, N.Y.––The American
SPCA won a preliminary injunction on August 12
against use of founder Henry Bergh’s name in con-
nection with fundraising by the Henry Bergh
Coalition, a reform group assembled last spring by
New York City activist Livi French.
The ASPCA accused French of trademark
infringement on June 27, after she began airing an
expose series entitled Eye on the ASPCA o n
Manhattan public access television. The first three
episodes presented pretaped interviews with Herman
Cohen, an ASPCA vice president from 1989 until
his firing in February, with three other senior offi-
cials, for alleged incompetence. The firings came
amid an overtime pay scandal, including the revela-
tion that former ASPCA senior investigator Huando
Torres had pocketed $340,000 in overtime since
1990, while serving as shop steward for one of two
ASPCA Teamsters locals (one of which was recent-
ly decertified.)
Soon thereafter, New York media revealed
the improper designation of ASPCA board members
as humane officers, to enable them to carry
guns––allegedly over the objections of Cohen,
Torres, and the Teamsters. But it happened on
Cohen’s watch, as ASPCA chief administrator until
an August 1993 demotion, after which he was head
of humane enforcement. The deputizations appar-
ently began in late 1992. In one case, Cohen pur-
portedly personally deputized board member Steven
Elkman’s wife Linda. The board gun-toting ended in
February, three months after then-ASPCA special
counsel Madeleine Bernstein advised that the prac-
tice put the ASPCA’s law enforcement status at risk.
Meanwhile, in October 1993, Cohen hit
the ASPCA with eight cruelty counts for failing to
fix the society’s deficient Manhattan shelter. All
counts were conditionally dismissed on June 13 after
senior vice president John Foran––Cohen’s replace-
ment as chief operating officer––testified that he had
given shelter repairs a high priority. Cohen filed the
cruelty charges on the same day Foran says he called
in an architect to plan $400,000 worth of retrofitting.
“He should have served the summons on
himself,” Foran recently told John Simerman of the
Manhattan weekly Our Town. Built during Cohen’s
term as chief administrator, the shelter opened in
April 1992.
Claiming he was fired for whistleblowing,
Cohen is reportedly suing the ASPCA. Two other
staffers who were fired for alleged incompetence,
Martin Belardo and Jose Fernandez, say they were
actually dumped for refusing to help Foran find cause
to fire Cohen. Torres is seeking reinstatement and
back pay through arbitration, arguing that Foran
ousted him to breaking the shelter unions. Union
strife is reportedly one reason the ASPCA is giving
up the New York City animal control contract after
this year, thereby getting rid of most of the unionized
staff. The unions are also said to be the main reason
that New York is unwilling to just absorb the ASPCA
animal control apparatus. The city recently rejected
the only legal bid it received for the animal control
contract, from the Dewey Animal Care Center of Las
Vegas, which reputedly does an outstanding job in
that city, and instead advertised in the July 31 edition
of The New York Times for leadership to form a new
nonprofit animal care and control corporation under
the direction of the city health department.

MARINE LIFE

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

Canada is secretly among the
nations trying to overturn the U.S. ban on
imports of tuna netted “on dolphin” as a
violation of the General Agreement on Trade
and Tariffs, according to a Canadian govern-
ment document disclosed by Michael
O’Sullivan of the Humane Society of Canada.
Canada has only a small tuna fleet, but seeks a
precedent toward overturning the pending
European Community ban on imports of fur
caught with leghold traps. Intended to take
effect in January, that ban has reportedly been
put off for another year, and is already subject
of a protest to the GATT tribunal by the U.S.-
based National Trappers Association.

Read more

Love & Care shelter in trouble again

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

MONTGOMERY, Alabama––Responding to consumer complaints,
attorney Greg Locklier of the Alabama Office of the Attorney General is “cur-
rently investigating Love and Care for God’s Animalife Inc.,” a purported no-
kill shelter based in Andalusia, Alabama, “for possible deceptive trade practices
and other violations of Alabama law.” Love and Care has moved and changed
business names several times in recent years while incurring debts and legal
problems in both Georgia and Alabama, including frequent alleged violations of
humane care standards. Founder Ann Fields now lives in California, Locklier
said. After longtime shelter manager Linda Lewis quit at the start of the sum-
mer, the already marginal care standards degenerated, according to Locklier, as
management chores were left to a staff of apparent illegal aliens. Shortly before
Lewis quit, she said Love and Care was housing 688 dogs, half of them age 10
or older, and 400-plus cats, of whom about half the females were unneutered.

HSUS: PROSECUTE CAT RESCUERS BECAUSE FERAL DOGS ARE DANGEROUS

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

According to Humane Society of the U.S. director for overpopulation
issues Kate Rindy, in a March 3 letter to Renee Welch of the Outer Banks
SPCA in Nag’s Head, North Carolina, neuter /release is a bad idea because,
“while feral cat colonies often stay within a confined area, feral dogs form packs
which roam over large areas and which can pose a threat to humans.”
Rindy and HSUS South Central Regional Office director Jim Tedford
also told Welch that neuter/release is illegal in North Carolina.
Welch had inquired in reference to monitored neuter/release of vacci-
nated cats as practiced by the Outer Banks Spay/Neuter Fund in nearby Kitty
Hawk, though she may not have given Rindy and Tedford complete context.
Using HSUS fact sheets on how neutering can cut animal control costs, Karen
LeBlanc of the OBSNF had approached the Dare County Animal Control
Advisory Board two weeks earlier to ask that $5,000 of its annual $104,227 sub-
sidy to the Outer Banks SPCA be earmarked for neutering assistance. The Outer
Banks SPCA objected––even after the OBSNF redrafted the proposal to stipu-
late that no public funds would be used for neuter/release. Armed with the Rindy
and Tedford letters, the Outer Banks SPCA on March 11 faxed a “Statement of
Disassociation” to local veterinarians and on March 13 published it as an adver-
tisement in The Coastland Times. The statement questioned the nonprofit status
of the OBSNF, a chapter of the California-based United Humanitarians, and
echoed without citing the source of the opinion that neuter/release is illegal.

Read more

Did Japan quit killing hawksbill turtles to resume killing whales?

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

TOKYO, Japan––More than
three years after former U.S. president
George Bush warned Japan to quit dealing in
hawksbill sea turtles or face trade sanctions
under the Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species, Japan on July 15
banned the import of the rare turtles and/or
their parts––after importing circa 30 tons of
hawksbill turtleshell during the first half of
1994 alone. The shells are used to make var-
ious ornamental sundries. The Bush warn-
ing, never followed up, was the first-ever
U.S. move to enforce CITES, although
Congress gave the President the authority to
do so in 1977. Japan is believed to have
imported parts of more than two million sea
turtles since 1971, according to Earth Island
Institute, including the shells of at least
234,000 hawksbills during the 1980s.

Read more

Sea Shepherd, Greenpeace take on Norwegian whalers; JAPAN IGNORES SANCTUARY; RUSSIA MAY FOLLOW

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1994:

NORTH SEA, TOKYO–––As a
summer of intense whaling and anti-whaling
activity off Norway closed, Japan announced
on August 12 that it too would flout the
International Whaling Commission by taking
an “exception” to the Southern Ocean Whale
Sanctuary, created in May. A similar
announcement was expected from Russia.
While Norway for the second year
unilaterally set a commercial whaling quota,
breaking the IWC moratorium on commercial
whaling in effect since 1986, Japan formally
objected to the inclusion of minke whales as a
protected species within the newly created
sanctuary, which includes 80% of the known
minke whale habitat: all waters south of the
40th parallel except for a dip around South
America. The objection means Japan will
proceed with plans for a so-called scientific
hunt of 300 minke whales within the sanctu-

Read more

1 144 145 146 147 148 169