Editorial: Wins, losses, and self-defeats

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, November 1998:

A single flash of lightning in mid-afternoon on October 12 presaged a brief rain
shower, apparently struck a telephone line, and blew out the main ANIMAL PEOPLE
editorial computer.
We’d thought we had adequate surge protection. The stray voltage bypassed it.
We thought we’d had all essential items backed up. We were catastrophically wrong. We
lost the core of our November edition, as it stood, one week from our original press date.
For almost a month we made do with a system cobbled together from a low-powered
1992-vintage laptop hooked to an external hard drive, giving us just enough electronic
memory to allow limited use of our layout program, plus reference access to our
archives. It wasn’t quite enough to put out a complete newspaper, but we hoped for two
weeks, while service centers dithered, that our old system would soon be repaired and our
lost data could be recovered.

Read more

Editorial: Henry and the No-Kill Conference

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 1998:

The late Henry Spira was invited to attend the recent No-Kill Conference in
Concord, California, but failing health forced him to decline.
Spira died at home in New York as the conference was in progress, having accomplished
more for animals caught up in farming and scientific research than anyone, perhaps,
since Mahavira and the Buddha. No one ever drove more successful bargains to spare animals––by
the million––from misery. Neither has anyone else in the animal protection cause
ever put more effort into teaching others the method Spira developed of systematically bringing
about change through what he called “stepwise incremental action.”
Though devoted to his cats, Spira didn’t work much on companion animal issues.

Read more

Editorial: Wolf & Simon

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 1998:

Having formed perhaps the farthest-reaching animal protection
newsgathering network ever, we may receive and read more cruelty
reports, from around the world, than anyone else who ever lived.
Readers reeling from the shock and horror of just the handful
of cases they’re familiar with often wonder how we cope.
We look out the window. The joy and surprise of animals is
never far, from the flash of a diving redtailed hawk, the chirp of newly
hatched songbirds, and the whir of a hummingbird, to the sentinel work
of our German shepherd, Tasha; the industry of the rats, mice, chipmunks,
squirrels, and rabbits who loot spillage from our bird feeder;
and the indefatigable concentration of our cats, who never tire of watching
them, tails twitching, from behind secure fences and screens.
Shrews, snakes, and even giant banana slugs likewise give us
moments of appreciative interest. Some creature is always doing something,
and frequently the action is not only heartening but unexpected.

Read more

Editorials: In bed with stars

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, July/August 1998:

They call themselves “gun nuts,” in seeming confession of mental instability and of
equating their weapons with manhood. There are 2.8 million of them, down from 3.5 million
as recently as 1995. They’re the National Rifle Association, desperate to reverse a decline
that has cut cash assets from $81 million in 1991 to just $43 million now.
On June 7, in Philadelphia, a setting selected to evoke historic imagery, the 1,600
delegates to the NRA annual convention elected actor Charlton Heston president.
Heston, 73, derives much of his claim to leadership from having played Moses in
the 1956 film The Ten Commandments––a weightier role, to be sure, than former U.S.
President Ronald Reagan’s most famous role, opposite a chimpanzee in Bedtime for Bonzo.
NRA foes chortled as Heston described himself as a moderate. As USA Today editorialists
noted, “Just last December, he likened gun owners to Jews during the Holocaust,
boasted that the Founding Fathers were ‘white guys,’ and said that U.S. President Bill
Clinton’s ‘shock troops…claim it’s time to place homosexual men in tents with Boy Scouts.’
In most worlds, that would count as lurid extremism.”
Political reality, though, is that celebrities attract big bucks, including from corporate
high donors, and without both money and star power, few campaigns succeed.
Thus, also on June 7, in Denver, the American Humane Association board accepted
the May 19 joint resignation of five members, and elected three replacements.
“The change resulted from fundamental differences in defining the role and function
of effective board members,” AHA secretary Robert F.X. Hart explained to staff. “The
majority of our board believe that the board should not be involved in micro-managing operations.
There was also widespread sentiment that board composition should be modified,” to
include “members who can provide us access to celebrities, finances, etc.”
The new AHA board members include actress Shirley Jones, L.A. Cellular vice
president of external affairs Steven C. Crosby, and David Grannis, introduced as “president
of Planning Company Associates, a company which specializes in strategic planning and
implementation to both the public and private sectors.”

Read more

Editorial: Crime and counseling

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 1998:

Pending before the California legislature as ANIMAL PEOPLE goes to press is
SB1991, a bill “to require counseling as a condition of probation for any person who is convicted
of killing, maiming or abusing an animal.”
Introduced by state senator Jack O’Connell (D-San Luis Obispo), SB1991 was
drafted by the Doris Day Animal League, and is endorsed by the Humane Society of the U.S.,
the Animal Protection Institute, and the Fund for Animals, among many other organizations.
SB1991 sounds good, on paper. If enacted, it will no doubt be ballyhooed in mailings
by all who support it as a “victory,” to be emulated in other states.
But Political Animals founder Sherry DeBoer sees SB1991 as at least potentially
“the most destructive piece of anti-animal legislation ever to move in California.”

Read more

Editorial: Peace plan two years later

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, May 1998:

Wesleyan University psychologist Scott Plous’ article “Signs of Change Within the
Animal Rights Movement,” just published in volume 112, #1 of the Journal of Comparative
Psychology, rates an exception to the usual rule that two-year-old opinion polls are not news.
Plous in June 1990 surveyed 402 participants in the first March for the Animals in
Washington D.C., and followed up in June 1996 by surveying 372 participants in the second
such march. These subjects were each at least 18 years of age, identified themselves as animal
rights activists, and “reported traveling from another state expressly to join the march.”
Their profiles each year were so similar, except in average duration of animal rights involvement,
which increased by three years, that Plous concluded the animal rights movement has
essentially stalled in terms of recruitment for a decade––a point increasingly evident to grassroots
organizers such as Joe Haptas of the Northwest Animal Rights Network, who says as
much in his letter on page 5 of this edition.

Read more

Editorial: Hop a Bus

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, April 1998:

Alan R. Andreasen’s book Marketing Social Change appeared in 1995, but a reader
only just brought it to our attention, noting the application to humane work in the subtitle:
Changing Behavior to Promote Health, Social Development, and the Environment.
This, the reader recognized, is exactly what is involved in getting people to fix their
dogs and cats, and quit either letting pets roam or leaving them alone, miserably chained.

Read more

Editorial: How they get your money

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, March 1998:

Each annual update of our December “Who gets the money?” feature brings a
blizzard of letters. Consisting mainly of statistics, with explanatory margin notes, “Who
gets the money?” could look rather dull––just a straightforward factual statement of the
budgets, assets, program versus overhead spending balance, and top salaries paid by the
100-odd most prominent animal and habitat protection charities.
Our readers, however, not only peruse the fine print, but beg for more.
“Percentages of money utilized for the stated goals is important,” wrote Delores
Hughes, of Santa Cruz, California, “but even more important is the question, ‘Are they
accomplishing anything worthwhile?’”
Elaborated Joan Winburn Hymas, of Cathedral City, California, “Is there any
way of determining how much good organizations such as the World Wildlife Fund and the
Humane Society of the U.S. are doing?”

Read more

Editorial: A passage to India

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, Jan/Feb 1998:

Faced with a choice between a rare chance for three representatives of ANIMAL
PEOPLE to visit India for the price of one, or a better chance to erase a budget deficit
before year’s end, we prioritized by considering which would be most valuable to our role
as an investigative newspaper.
Though sustaining solvency is self-evidently critical, we found we had no real
choice but to find out what was happening in India. Almost directly opposite to us on the
earth, scarcely anywhere could have proved more relevant or enlightening relative to the
state of humane work and wildlife conservation in North America.
We knew already that India has the oldest recorded humane tradition, is the only
nation which constitutionally recognizes a human obligation to treat animals kindly, has
more than half the world’s vegetarians, has more native mammals and birds than any other,
and is deeply involved in the struggle to protect endangered species.
With due respect to the economic clout of Japan and sheer size of China, we recognized
as well that India may be pivotal in determining the cultural, social, and moral
direction of all Asia. India has accomplished a perhaps unparalleled synthesis of westernstyle
democratic government and technological transition, still underway, with social stability,
lifting a growing percentage of her people out of dire poverty and illiteracy despite
rapid population growth that has only just begun to slow.

Read more

1 14 15 16 17 18 24